{"id":2936,"date":"2020-10-05T00:12:52","date_gmt":"2020-10-05T00:12:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/?p=2936"},"modified":"2020-10-05T15:58:29","modified_gmt":"2020-10-05T15:58:29","slug":"lexi-conflict-trump-vs-biden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/2020\/10\/05\/lexi-conflict-trump-vs-biden\/","title":{"rendered":"Lexi-Conflict: Trump vs Biden"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The political circus surrounding the U.S. election has already moved on to something more <a href=\"https:\/\/theslot.jezebel.com\/now-thats-an-october-surprise-bitch-1845252993\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">interesting<\/a> but I wanted to take a look at last week&#8217;s presidential debates from a lexicological standpoint. Full disclosure: I didn&#8217;t actually watch the entire debate in real time because I value my sanity. However, I was able to download a good transcript from the folks over at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rev.com\/blog\/transcripts\/donald-trump-joe-biden-1st-presidential-debate-transcript-2020\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Rev<\/a>. For the sake of brevity, I&#8217;ll only cover a few high-level thoughts.<\/p>\n<p>First, using a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/textinspector.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">text inspector tool<\/a>, let&#8217;s take a look at the basic structure of the debate:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2943\" src=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"672\" height=\"307\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_1.png 672w, https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_1-300x137.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 672px) 100vw, 672px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Speaking time between the two candidates was about even, but this estimate is based on the start of individual utterances and doesn&#8217;t count interruptions (of which there were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kare11.com\/article\/news\/local\/breaking-the-news\/an-interruption-every-minute-can-anyone-fix-the-remaining-presidential-debates\/89-a8d240fe-e209-41bf-9039-ad4038cd62cf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">many<\/a>). I was actually surprised to see how much time the moderator, Chris Wallace, spent talking &#8230; although he did need to intervene quite often and most of this probably consisted of the phrase &#8220;Mr. President, please.&#8221; Trump had more sentences over the course of the debate but his type count &#8212; the number of unique words (or types) &#8212; was lower.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-2947\" src=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"672\" height=\"307\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_2.png 672w, https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_2-300x137.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 672px) 100vw, 672px\" \/><\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The average sentence length, the average number syllables per sentence, and average syllables per word, were lower for Trump and higher for Biden and Wallace (whom I&#8217;m including just for comparison). Biden fell in the middle in all cases. This seems to go against Trump&#8217;s normally <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/2016\/8\/18\/12423688\/donald-trump-speech-style-explained-by-linguists\" target=\"_blank\">convoluted speaking style<\/a> and may be a factor of the transcription. Still, it suggests a more dynamic way of speaking &#8212; shorter, punchier statements &#8212; which could be beneficial at public rallies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"672\" height=\"307\" src=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2951\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_3.png 672w, https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Summary_Chart_3-300x137.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 672px) 100vw, 672px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_readability_tests\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Flesch Reading Ease score<\/a> &#8212; a measure of ease of understanding &#8230; higher is easier &#8212; suggests that both candidates were speaking at about a 6th grade level during the debate. These scores are considered standard conversational English. Chris Wallace&#8217;s language was slightly more difficult to follow but not by much. The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_readability_tests\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Flesch-Kincaid Grade<\/a> test translates these scores to a U.S. grade level &#8212; again with Trump slightly easier to follow than Biden. The <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gunning_fog_index\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Gunning Fog index<\/a> places the candidate&#8217;s speech in the middle school\/junior high school range.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Parsing the transcript for individual words reveals a few interesting findings. Among the unique words uttered by each candidate (and <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">not<\/span> uttered by the other candidate) a few standouts include the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"334\" height=\"190\" src=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Table_1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2952\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Table_1.png 334w, https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Table_1-300x171.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 334px) 100vw, 334px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It&#8217;s interesting to see how Trump personalizes his communication with both his opponent and the moderator (e.g. Joe, Chris) while Biden does not. This hints at a speaking style honed in the business world where usage of a first name can signal an informal setting. Other unique words to Trump encompass a specific reference to actions (e.g. &#8220;closed&#8221; the country during the virus) or challenges (e.g. &#8220;name&#8221; one group that does X).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Biden is much more likely to use words like &#8220;America&#8221; and &#8220;American&#8221; to engage the audience in discussions of the country itself (e.g. &#8220;the American people&#8221;). I find it kind of weird that Trump doesn&#8217;t use this word at all. Biden also uses a few unique filler phrases (e.g. &#8220;here&#8217;s&#8221; the deal) and got caught up in arguments with Trump around the accuracy of certain facts (e.g. &#8220;discredited&#8221; reports).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Looking at word usage in situations where both candidates uttered the word at least once, we can see some interesting highlights of common pronouns:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"480\" height=\"500\" src=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Chart_1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2954\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Chart_1.png 480w, https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Chart_1-288x300.png 288w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the chart, highlighted words are those that were used over twice as often by one candidate. Biden used the word &#8220;he&#8221; to refer to Trump throughout the debate, perhaps reinforcing his desire to connect to the audience. Trump made the debate more confrontational by speaking to Biden in the second person (e.g. &#8220;you&#8221;) or using his first name as noted above. Trump also has his own filler phrase (e.g. let &#8220;me&#8221; tell you) and signature words (e.g. &#8220;they&#8221;) that he uses to create generalized situations or to emphasize a point. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The she\/her disparity refers to a segment discussing the qualifications of Judge Amy Coney Barrett. The difference between the possessive pronoun (&#8220;her&#8221; views) and the subjective pronoun (&#8220;she&#8221; thinks) is interesting just because of the implied difference between the focus on the individual and a more general discussion of a role in the country&#8217;s judiciary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For filler words:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"480\" height=\"501\" src=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Chart_2.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2956\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Chart_2.png 480w, https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Word_Chart_2-287x300.png 287w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In addition to a few key filler phrases, Trump and Biden both have several crutch words they use frequently. Trump uses these words to emphasize the end of sentences (e.g. &#8220;okay&#8221;) and as a universal adjective\/adverb (e.g. &#8220;very&#8221;). Biden&#8217;s filler words serve a similar adjective\/adverb role (e.g. &#8220;totally&#8221; discredited).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Other notable words used by Trump included the word &#8220;forest&#8221; and the number &#8220;47.&#8221; Both of these represent attempts to inject new political talking points into the debate: &#8220;forest&#8221; being the latest argument against the realities of climate change (the fires in California being driven by poor forest management instead) and &#8220;47&#8221; being the number of years that Biden has been in office (<a href=\"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/2020\/09\/29\/the-short-circuiting-of-the-american-mind-part-2-generation-q\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"2926\">expertise is bad!<\/a>). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Finally, Biden used the word &#8220;fact&#8221; nearly ten times as often as Trump during the debate. My gut tells me that this approach won&#8217;t work on the typical Trump supporter but I admire the Vice President&#8217;s attempt to introduce some traditional forensic techniques (reality!) into the discussion. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The political circus surrounding the U.S. election has already moved on to something more interesting but I wanted to take a look at last week&#8217;s presidential debates from a lexicological standpoint. Full&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2958,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[176,205,206,208,207],"class_list":["post-2936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-information","tag-donald-trump","tag-joe-biden","tag-lexicon","tag-presidential-debate","tag-text-analysis"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/Debate_Graphic.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2936"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2936\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2967,"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2936\/revisions\/2967"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2958"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ideasillustrated.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}